Some SyFy channel movies are worth seeing while others are like this film Carny (2009), which is nothing but the same-old-same-old. When a side show carnival shows up in the outskirts of a small town, their prized new freak is that of a winged devil-creature that was acquired through nefarious ways. When the devil-creature gets lose it is up to the town sheriff Atlas (Lou Diamond Phillips) to rid them of the creature at any costs.
Now this film has the distinction of being just like any other SyFy film with the small town sheriff out to protect his town from the evil monster. The problem with this film lies in the bland characters and mediocre monster, which is made even more inane by the subpar CGI effects. It also hurts the film that there are no other “freaks” that are even remotely interesting. It’s a side show carnival that lacks any real “carnies” which makes the scenes when the monster isn’t on screen very mundane.
I enjoy Phillips in low budget films (i.e. Bats, Route 666, Red Water) but this film even he can’t save. This film lacks anything more than just the superficial horror genre trappings which is fine if it has an interesting monster or great actors (the hallmark of any good SyFy movie) but this films lacks both. Phillips is but one man in a film that should be filled with freaks. At least they would have made the film more interesting.
CITY GARDEN - "The Old Woman & The Park"
On the set of the short film "A Gift"
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Film Review: CRITTERS 3
By the time Critters 3 (1991) is released all the steam is out of the franchise but production company New Line Cinema decides to film 2 sequels at once (as parts 3 & 4 are released just a year apart). It is not explained how there can possibly be any more critters left after the last film only that Earth bound bounty hunter Charlie (Don Opper) is still at work making the world safe from the creatures the best way that he can.
This time a critters catches a ride with a impoverished family who have stopped over near Grover’s Bend. A father and his two children come into contact with a run-down Charlie who looks more like a homeless man than a bounty hunter. When the family returns home to their apartment complex they are unaware of their hitchhiker and soon the complex is overrun with critters.
If you thought the original film was light on violence then you haven’t seen anything as this film is far too kid-friendly for its own good. Even though the main characters are still kids this film makes you think as though the film makers were trying to make a film for the PG crowd and the overall films suffers for it as it is far to domesticated for my tastes. After an all too brief appearance at the beginning Charlie doesn’t reappear until half way through the film and he is played completely for laughs this go-around. Although the previous two films had their humor and the character of Charlie has always been the comic foil, there is no one in this film that can balance the comedy like Scott Grimes did in the previous films. The film makers try to do this with the three main children leads in the film but they can’t hold the film and the overall film suffers. This film is actually boring through many of the repetitive parts.
This being sad I enjoyed the ending of the film more than the film itself as the End Credit sequence sets up the events for Part 4 and it is a welcomed return to see Terrence Mann return as Ug (despite the fact that at the end of Part 2 he has the same face as Charlie).
This time a critters catches a ride with a impoverished family who have stopped over near Grover’s Bend. A father and his two children come into contact with a run-down Charlie who looks more like a homeless man than a bounty hunter. When the family returns home to their apartment complex they are unaware of their hitchhiker and soon the complex is overrun with critters.
If you thought the original film was light on violence then you haven’t seen anything as this film is far too kid-friendly for its own good. Even though the main characters are still kids this film makes you think as though the film makers were trying to make a film for the PG crowd and the overall films suffers for it as it is far to domesticated for my tastes. After an all too brief appearance at the beginning Charlie doesn’t reappear until half way through the film and he is played completely for laughs this go-around. Although the previous two films had their humor and the character of Charlie has always been the comic foil, there is no one in this film that can balance the comedy like Scott Grimes did in the previous films. The film makers try to do this with the three main children leads in the film but they can’t hold the film and the overall film suffers. This film is actually boring through many of the repetitive parts.
This being sad I enjoyed the ending of the film more than the film itself as the End Credit sequence sets up the events for Part 4 and it is a welcomed return to see Terrence Mann return as Ug (despite the fact that at the end of Part 2 he has the same face as Charlie).
Film Review: CRITTERS 2: THE MAIN COURSE
Bigger. Badder. And out for more food. The critters are back for more in Critters 2: The Main Course (1988) and back with them are returning bounty hunters Ug and Lee and Brad Brown (Scott Grimes) to save his little town from an all new infestation.
After the events of the first film the Brown family is unaware that Critter eggs were left in their barn where the cold has kept them in suspended animation for several years. An uncouple less junk sales man gets his hands on them and sells them to an unsuspecting woman who is contributing them to the yearly Eater Egg Hunt. This all coincides with Brad’s return home after leaving due to the events surrounding the first critter attack. He gets more than he bargained for when this new batch is more fierce and hungrier and are multiplying at an exponential rate. Now Brad must get the whole town to help him rid them of the infestation before they are completely over run.
This film is much bigger than the previous film and with a bigger budget it shows. The film is no longer limited to just one location like the original film and there are more explosions and more critters all over the place. This is a film that when it says, “Bigger is better,” they actually mean it. This film also ups the stakes as main characters are killed off and more people meet their deaths than in the previous film (which was tame compared to this film). There is plenty of humor to be had and just as much action (which makes up for the lack of suspense since the critters are not as menacing as they were in the previous film).
This is a rare instance where a sequel improves upon the original which is due to the strong screenplay by David Twohy (Warlock, The Arrival, Pitch Black) and Mick Garris (The Stand, Desperation), who also directed. The film also has a great supporting cast with many people returning from the original but also adding in a few new faces such as Liane Curtis, Sam Anderson, and Barry Corbin, to name a few.
After the events of the first film the Brown family is unaware that Critter eggs were left in their barn where the cold has kept them in suspended animation for several years. An uncouple less junk sales man gets his hands on them and sells them to an unsuspecting woman who is contributing them to the yearly Eater Egg Hunt. This all coincides with Brad’s return home after leaving due to the events surrounding the first critter attack. He gets more than he bargained for when this new batch is more fierce and hungrier and are multiplying at an exponential rate. Now Brad must get the whole town to help him rid them of the infestation before they are completely over run.
This film is much bigger than the previous film and with a bigger budget it shows. The film is no longer limited to just one location like the original film and there are more explosions and more critters all over the place. This is a film that when it says, “Bigger is better,” they actually mean it. This film also ups the stakes as main characters are killed off and more people meet their deaths than in the previous film (which was tame compared to this film). There is plenty of humor to be had and just as much action (which makes up for the lack of suspense since the critters are not as menacing as they were in the previous film).
This is a rare instance where a sequel improves upon the original which is due to the strong screenplay by David Twohy (Warlock, The Arrival, Pitch Black) and Mick Garris (The Stand, Desperation), who also directed. The film also has a great supporting cast with many people returning from the original but also adding in a few new faces such as Liane Curtis, Sam Anderson, and Barry Corbin, to name a few.
Film Review: CRITTERS (1986)
In 1986 a creature feature was crafted to cash in on the success of the Joe Dante film Gremlins (1984). The result was this uniquely crafty horror film Critters. Similar in tone to that of its predecessor, Critters was the “Roger Corman” version of Gremlins in a similar way that Dante’s other film Piranha (1978) was a rip-off of Jaws (1975).
Critters concern a race of aliens that crash land on Earth in search of nothing more than food and to procreate. On their trail are two shape-shifting bounty hunters who will hunt the critters down at any cost. What stands in the critters way is the farm house of Brad Brown (Scott Grimes) and his family. Brad is the quintessential trouble maker who wars with his older sister and constantly makes a nuisance of himself for his mother and father. His only friend is the local drunk Charlie (Don Opper) who is the only person that believes him when he says that there are aliens that have landed. Now Brad must enlist the help of the bounty hunters in order to save his family from the hungry balls of critter fur.
The film works in a different way than Gremlins in that these creatures are intelligent and speak their own language (which makes for some very funny moments in the film) and they actually are the source of a lot of nice suspense in the film. The film is also dark in atmosphere while maintaining a nice balance with the comic tone and humor of the film. Despite the similarities that the film has with its predecessor it stands on its own due to the sci-fi aspects of the film (which Gremlins does not have).
Critters become such as success as to warrant three sequels and making it one of the more interesting franchises of the ‘80s.
Critters concern a race of aliens that crash land on Earth in search of nothing more than food and to procreate. On their trail are two shape-shifting bounty hunters who will hunt the critters down at any cost. What stands in the critters way is the farm house of Brad Brown (Scott Grimes) and his family. Brad is the quintessential trouble maker who wars with his older sister and constantly makes a nuisance of himself for his mother and father. His only friend is the local drunk Charlie (Don Opper) who is the only person that believes him when he says that there are aliens that have landed. Now Brad must enlist the help of the bounty hunters in order to save his family from the hungry balls of critter fur.
The film works in a different way than Gremlins in that these creatures are intelligent and speak their own language (which makes for some very funny moments in the film) and they actually are the source of a lot of nice suspense in the film. The film is also dark in atmosphere while maintaining a nice balance with the comic tone and humor of the film. Despite the similarities that the film has with its predecessor it stands on its own due to the sci-fi aspects of the film (which Gremlins does not have).
Critters become such as success as to warrant three sequels and making it one of the more interesting franchises of the ‘80s.
Film Review: MANEATER (2007)
I wish I could say that this Gary Busey starring throwback to ‘80s made-for-television horror is horrible (like so many other films that premiered on the Syfy channel) but oddly enough it’s not terrible. The film Maneater (2007), which shouldn’t be confused with the countless other films with the same title, concerns Grady Barnes (Busey) whose small town is suddenly under attack from a wild Bengal Tiger that has misplaced from its known world. He then must enlist the aid of the National Guard and a wild game tiger hunter from India in order to kill the wild tiger before any more people are killed despite the fact that the Mayor refuses to close down the local Corn & Apple Festival which brings in lots of tourists and keeps their small town alive.
Sounds like a riff-off of Jaws (1975) and for the most part it is, just replace the giant great white with a Bengal Tiger and there you have it. The thing that makes this film slightly different from other films is the religious allegory and motif that is established between the tiger and the small boy in which the tiger has become attached (and is the only person exempt from the tiger’s jaws). This doesn’t make the film better as it suffers from mediocre acting from most of the cast (although Busey does give a much more subtle performance than I’m used to).
An asset to the film is the real tiger used in the film and the lack of CGI effects. This film feels like a monster film from the ‘80s from beginning to end. Unlike other Syfy films that rely too heavily on the CGI monster it was nice to see a film that strived for realism. This is not to say that the film was a masterpiece but it’s nice to see that there are still a few films being made in which they feel like the films I watched on television when I was young.
Sounds like a riff-off of Jaws (1975) and for the most part it is, just replace the giant great white with a Bengal Tiger and there you have it. The thing that makes this film slightly different from other films is the religious allegory and motif that is established between the tiger and the small boy in which the tiger has become attached (and is the only person exempt from the tiger’s jaws). This doesn’t make the film better as it suffers from mediocre acting from most of the cast (although Busey does give a much more subtle performance than I’m used to).
An asset to the film is the real tiger used in the film and the lack of CGI effects. This film feels like a monster film from the ‘80s from beginning to end. Unlike other Syfy films that rely too heavily on the CGI monster it was nice to see a film that strived for realism. This is not to say that the film was a masterpiece but it’s nice to see that there are still a few films being made in which they feel like the films I watched on television when I was young.
Graphic Novel Review: THE 'NAM Vol. 1
The late ‘80s were dominated by superhero comics. All other genres were pushed aside to make way for the latest Spider-Man or Batman title or the latest debut of an all new Marvel or DC character but war comics were seen as something that was dead and buried. Then in ’86 Marvel debuted what was thought to be an oddity and a gamble with the very real and very gritty title The ‘Nam, which depicted events during the Vietnam war in a very realistic manner from the grunts point of view. Although not an instant success, The ‘Nam became one of the most ground breaking titles of the ‘80s. This first volume collects the first 10 issues of the series.
When the title was originally released, I didn’t catch on to it until the issue 8 or 9 and I was hooked immediately. It was unlike any other title I had ever read. Trying to pick up back issues was extremely hard as they became immediate collector’s items but Marvel (the company that released the title) was smart enough to reprint back issues in the form of The ‘Nam Magazine (covers of which are included at the end of the graphic novel). This graphic novel is a reprint of an earlier version just rebound and recolored (the original graphic novel covers are also included). This is a very handsomely presented collection of one of the greatest war comics.
Reading the series in sequential order is a revelation as the stories were designed to be in real time and there be a month of time that goes in between each story (the release date of each issue) so reading the series in which it was meant gives you a whole different perspective on the events and characters of the series especially when very well liked main characters are killed off at a moment’s notice (similar to that of the real war). People coming to the title for the very first time will benefit from this and those (like me) who haven’t read the series since it was originally released will be given a new perspective on one of the greatest of all war comics.
When the title was originally released, I didn’t catch on to it until the issue 8 or 9 and I was hooked immediately. It was unlike any other title I had ever read. Trying to pick up back issues was extremely hard as they became immediate collector’s items but Marvel (the company that released the title) was smart enough to reprint back issues in the form of The ‘Nam Magazine (covers of which are included at the end of the graphic novel). This graphic novel is a reprint of an earlier version just rebound and recolored (the original graphic novel covers are also included). This is a very handsomely presented collection of one of the greatest war comics.
Reading the series in sequential order is a revelation as the stories were designed to be in real time and there be a month of time that goes in between each story (the release date of each issue) so reading the series in which it was meant gives you a whole different perspective on the events and characters of the series especially when very well liked main characters are killed off at a moment’s notice (similar to that of the real war). People coming to the title for the very first time will benefit from this and those (like me) who haven’t read the series since it was originally released will be given a new perspective on one of the greatest of all war comics.
Graphic Novel Review: ZOMBIEWORLD: CHAMPION OF THE WORMS
The zombie genre has become its own cottage industry when it comes to the comic industry so it was with great apprehension that I picked up ZOMBIEWORLD Vol. 1: CHAMPION OF THE WORMS but I did because of the talent behind the book. I’ve always been a Mike Mignola fan so I was curious on how he would approach the material and even though I am not familiar with the art of Pat McEown it was very similar to Mignola’s own.
The story does not waste time getting straight into the story as Major Damson and his group of paranormal specialists has been consulted by a museum with a new Hyperborean relic which has been causing the museum several superstitious problems. Damson believes that the museum has unwilling set into motion the resurrection of Azzul Gotha, one of the most dreaded necromancers of the Hyperborean people, who was entombed alive in a sarcophagus. Azzul Gotha wants to bring about the end of the world and appease his Worm Gods. Now Damson and his team must find the resurrected Azzul Gotha and stop him before he can raise the dead and bring about the end of the world.
Like many of Mignola’s stories this is very fast paced but unlike the successful Hellboy books this story lacks the depth and characters of those books. This story falls flat partly because the characters never become fully developed and the story lacks any real creativity or originality. There is nothing new here that hasn’t been seen or done before. Damson’s team all seem unique and interesting but very little time is spent on any of them and they come off as being very flat and at times dull.
Being a huge fan of the zombie genre I wish I could say some good things about the title but I’ll reserve that for the next Hellboy story.
The story does not waste time getting straight into the story as Major Damson and his group of paranormal specialists has been consulted by a museum with a new Hyperborean relic which has been causing the museum several superstitious problems. Damson believes that the museum has unwilling set into motion the resurrection of Azzul Gotha, one of the most dreaded necromancers of the Hyperborean people, who was entombed alive in a sarcophagus. Azzul Gotha wants to bring about the end of the world and appease his Worm Gods. Now Damson and his team must find the resurrected Azzul Gotha and stop him before he can raise the dead and bring about the end of the world.
Like many of Mignola’s stories this is very fast paced but unlike the successful Hellboy books this story lacks the depth and characters of those books. This story falls flat partly because the characters never become fully developed and the story lacks any real creativity or originality. There is nothing new here that hasn’t been seen or done before. Damson’s team all seem unique and interesting but very little time is spent on any of them and they come off as being very flat and at times dull.
Being a huge fan of the zombie genre I wish I could say some good things about the title but I’ll reserve that for the next Hellboy story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
